Index and no-load funds seem like a no-brainer, why do managed funds exists?
September 5th, 2010
All my investments are in managed funds and to be honest the gains have been mediocre for more than 8 years. I feel I am missing something, why do we pay these professionals that dont seem to add value
My Related Websites
- NewNet News – Future Capital Partners acquires Unicorn Investments …
- Fausta's Blog » Blog Archive » 8 years of Iraq < Stimulus Act
- WWC TV report featuring Konnan from 8 years ago — zacsgames.com
- Investments Solutions Uk: Know Your Investment Objective
- Differences Between Low Risk Investments
- Hemsley's investments aren't plain sailing | Investing Contrarian
- Graciemag International » Cain Velasquez: “I felt there was …
- Woman receives letter 10 years after it was sent…8 years after …
- How To Be Fortunate Holding Different Types Of Investments | Asset …
- What's Missing From Our Country »Politics & How They Affect Our …
- 10 Girls Size 7-8 Years Tops and Outfits From The Children's Place …
- Accelerating your Investments With Margin Lending | Business
- Kelly Clarkson Celebrates 8 Years Since Winning 'American Idol …
- Something Missing | Ms. Single Mama
- Florida Real Estate Investments And Tax Options
- Am I missing something with counting cards in Blackjack? | Epoc …
- What do you think about dating a guy that's 8 years younger? » Answer
Mail this post
Posted in 
Tags: 
80% of managed funds don’t beat the SP500 over the long term, but 20% do. Some like BRKA are famous for beating the SP500. That manager says most people would be better off buying into a passive low fee index instead of a managed fund. Over the long term 3% can be a big difference and some thing a managed fund will give them that edge.
you are probably buying the wrong ones. look at the composition and see if it is similar to the other guys.